Skip to content
Act 1: Once Upon A Time
Some numbers should stop us in our tracks. Not because numbers tell the whole story — they never do — but because sometimes we need the cold facts before we can talk honestly about what's really going on.
Elephants In The Room
Some numbers should stop us in our tracks. Not because numbers tell the whole story — they never do — but sometimes we need the cold facts before we can talk honestly about what's really going on.
In 2023, 7,055 people in the UK died by suicide
(). Each one of those was somebody's person. Somebody's dad, mum, brother, sister, friend. Somebody who, at some point, had a story they couldn't find their way out of.
About three-quarters of the people who died were men (). That figure really sticks with me. It reflects a culture that makes it incredibly difficult for men to admit when they're having a hard time openly.
There's this prevailing belief that reaching out for help is somehow a sign of failure, and vulnerability gets confused with weakness. The messages men receive about what it means to be a man often push them to stay silent when they actually need support, rather than encouraging them to seek help and survive.
Then
… there's… is…the… waiting…
Over 5 million requests for mental health support were made in England alone in 2023 — a 33% increase since 2019 (). More than 1.2 million people are currently sitting on NHS mental health waiting lists, and those numbers just keep climbing ().
I think about what it actually feels like to finally summon the courage to ask for help — often after months or years of struggling alone — only to be handed a ticket for a train that never seems to come, told that someone will be with you eventually, when the system finds room for your particular shade of pain.
The Treatment Gap
The financial cost is sobering. Mental health support in its current form costs the UK roughly £118 billion each year (). But money doesn't capture the real human cost — families torn apart, dreams that never happen, silent struggles no one sees or records. Nearly three-quarters of people who die by suicide in the UK weren't known to mental health services. They weren't on waiting lists. They weren't in the system. (). No one had reached them, maybe no one had even tried.
Only one in three adults with a common mental health problem here at home in the UK currently receives any treatment at all (). That means two in three are navigating their darkest moments entirely alone, with whatever they can find, whatever they can cobble together from their own resources and the kindness of the people around them. I am one of those people. When I was at my lowest, I reached deep inside and asked for help. I was rejected by the system.
The post-vulnerability fall was beyond anything I can find words for. So against all odds, I found my own way — through art, through animals, through stories, through the slow and painful process of rewriting who I thought I was. That journey saved my life. But it was lonely, and it was hard, and it should not have to be that brutally hard.
This is the treatment gap. And it is not a gap:
It is a chasm.
A Feeling Of Hope
I have sat in rooms with people who have been to the brink and returned, witnessing a profound shift in their eyes—from shame to dignity, from isolation to connection. I have seen a six-story mural in Philadelphia created by a thousand volunteers and watched as strangers paused on the pavement below, feeling a transformation within themselves. I have gathered in a community space in Ithaca where anyone could walk in off the street, enjoy a coffee, and share their story—no referral, no diagnosis, no waiting list. I have met a man in Philadelphia who lost his father to suicide. Having stood on the edge himself, he channelled that pain into a movement that has touched hundreds of thousands worldwide.
The challenges are immense. But so genuinely, evidentially, provably, is the potential for change. The question is not whether stories can help. The question is why we are not using them deliberately, systematically, and urgently — as part of everything we do.
That is what this report is about.
Stories Are Not Neutral
On that autumn evening in 1983, the most powerful man on earth sat alone at Camp David and watched a fictional television film. He wasn't reading intelligence briefings or studying military strategy. He was watching a story. And that story. The Day After: a two-hour drama about a nuclear attack on a small American town — sent him into what his official biographer described as a profound "funk" ().
/
"It's very effective and left me greatly depressed... My reaction was one of our having to do all we can to see that there is never a nuclear war."
Within days, Reagan's public rhetoric had shifted. Within a few years, the United States and the Soviet Union had signed the INF Treaty, eliminating an entire class of nuclear weapons. During the Reykjavik Summit, where the two superpowers came closer to total nuclear disarmament than at any point in history, the director of The Day After received a telegram from the Reagan administration that read simply:
"Don't think your movie had any part of this, because it did."
A fictional story. A real treaty. Lives saved that will never know they were saved.
Stories have always shaped us — long before we had the science to explain why. They travel differently through us than facts do. A statistic about nuclear war sits in the mind as an abstraction. A story about a family in Lawrence, Kansas, watching the sky turn white — that lives in the body. It keeps a president up at night. It changes what feels possible and what feels unthinkable.
The same is true — profoundly, urgently true — in the world of mental health and suicide. Research has identified two opposing forces that capture this double-edged power. They are named, fittingly, after fictional characters.
"Suicide has permeated Western culture like a dye that cannot be washed out."…
… Alfred Alvarez, The Savage God (1971)
Werther & Papageno
In 1774, Goethe published The Sorrows of Young Werther — a novel whose romantic portrayal of a young man's suicide triggered Werther Fever, a wave of copycat deaths so severe that several countries banned the book. I read Alfred Alvarez's landmark on the plane to America and back — tracing the dark thread of suicide through Western culture. His central observation has stayed with me:
Two centuries later, sociologist David Phillips showed that suicide rates increased following sensationalised media coverage of the act (). This phenomenon, known as the Werther Effect, highlights an uncomfortable yet crucial truth: the way we narrate a story and what we choose to emphasise truly matters. It's not about censorship; it's about taking responsibility for our words.
But there's another side to this — and it gives me real hope. In Mozart's The Magic Flute, Papageno is about to end his life when three spirits appear to talk him back from the edge. They remind Papageno that there are other future stories of potential and possibilities, not just this one of finality. He chooses to live. In 2010, researchers found something remarkable: when news reports focused on people who'd thought about suicide but found ways to cope, suicide rates actually went down (). Known as the Papageno Effect, the same medium. Same subject. Polar opposite outcomes. The difference is not whether suicide is discussed — it is how it should be discussed, and whose story got told.
What This Means
The Samaritans make it clear in their media guidelines: reporting on suicide inappropriately can lead to harmful imitative or copycat behaviour. On the other hand, sensitive and factual reporting can educate the public and inspire those in need to seek help ().
However, I believe we need to dig deeper than just media guidelines. This idea—that the way we tell stories can either harm or heal—isn't limited to journalists. It applies to all of us: to our communities, policymakers, the NHS, and even to those who may only encounter a story about suicide in passing. Whether it's a fleeting headline, a mural, a discussion at the local barbershop, or a stranger's note on a city wall, the narratives we share can have profound impacts on people's lives.
It applies, if I am honest, to me. My story could have ended very differently. The stories I encountered — the right ones, at the right moments — helped turn me around. Not a waiting list. Not a referral. A story. This is why I went to America — to find out what those stories look like when deliberately built, with purpose and craft. What I found changed everything I thought I knew.
Science Of Storytelling
When I first began arguing that storytelling could save lives, I was working from instinct and experience rather than science. I had lived it. But I also knew that experience, however hard-won, is not enough to change the minds of those in power: systems trained to demand evidence. So I went looking for the evidence.
It turns out that the power of stories is not mystical. It is not sentimental. It is not the exclusive territory of artists, poets, and people who cry at films. It is biological. It is measurable. It is happening inside your brain right now, as you read these words.
When You Hear a Story
When you hear someone share a genuine story, your brain starts to align with theirs. Studies using functional MRI have shown that the listener's brain activity reflects that of the speaker's — affecting not only language-related areas but also regions linked to emotions, memories, sensory experiences, and the internalisation and creation of identity, purpose & meaning ().
Hasson and colleagues referred to this phenomenon as brain-to-brain coupling, indicating that we momentarily experience a reduced sense of separation from the self and one another ().
The Bonding Chemical
There is more. When we become emotionally engaged in a story — when we care about what happens to the person telling it — our brains release oxytocin (). Oxytocin makes us more trusting, more empathetic, more willing to help — it flips a switch that bypasses our usual defences (). I did not know this when I shared suicide recovery stories with over 100 men. But I felt it all those years ago.
Each story was a motivating, moving, powerful story of change. Of Phil Connors escaping to the epic saga’s archetypal David-versus-Goliath, The Hero's Journey, as it were. Something changed as the stories began. Something loosened. People who had arrived guarded and silent began to lean forward. Eyes that had been fixed on the floor began to meet other eyes. That was not sentiment. That was biology — the oxytocin released when one human being says honestly to another: "This is what it felt like. This is how I found my way."
Stories Make Facts Real
Stories make information stick. Facts presented within a narrative are significantly more memorable and more likely to change behaviour than data alone (). This is why Reagan's nuclear policy shifted after a film rather than a Pentagon briefing. The briefing provided him with facts, while the film conveyed emotions. These are the emotions that make people change. Someone sitting in silence at 2 a.m., not knowing their pain has a name, won't be moved by statistics. They'll connect through a story.
The Evidence Base
For those who need clinical evidence, it's there. Peer-led storytelling interventions have reduced suicide attempts in randomised controlled trials (). Narrative therapy has cut suicidal ideation significantly among adolescents ().
Digital storytelling reduces stigma and encourages people to seek help — especially those who'd never walk into formal services (). Group therapy with storytelling has lowered grief and suicidal thoughts among people who've lost someone to suicide (). For Indigenous youth, digital storytelling interventions decreased suicidal ideation through cultural identity ().
Pennebaker's research shows something powerful: writing about difficult experiences privately — with no audience — improves both psychological and physical health. Putting feelings into words decreases activity in the amygdala, helping integrate fragmented memories into a coherent story (). Writing your story doesn't just improve your emotional state; it also helps you understand your story. It changes your brain.
Why This Matters
The implications aren't complicated. If stories release oxytocin and build trust, create more spaces for them. If stories synchronise brains and reduce isolation, fund community storytelling spaces as seriously as we fund clinical interventions. If stories change minds more powerfully than statistics, put lived-experience voices at the front of every public health campaign. If expressive or therapeutic writing improves health at very little cost, make journaling tools available to all on mental health waiting lists — routinely, not occasionally. None of this is radical. None of it is untested. The science is clear, the evidence is there. The question is whether we're willing to take it seriously.
Copyright © 2026 Kane Dodgson. The moral right of the author has been asserted. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and not of the Churchill Fellowship or its partners.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.